Search Engine Optimization Identical Content Charge Myth Increased

Clarification: there is a true identical content penalty for content that's duplicated with minor or no difference across the pages of just one site. There's also a 'reflection' punishment for a site that's pretty much substantially saying…

The 'duplicate content fee' fantasy is one of the greatest hurdles I face in getting web professionals to grasp re-print content. The myth is that search engines can penalize a niche site if a lot of its content can also be o-n other sites.

Clarification: there's a real duplicate content charge for content that's replicated with minor or no difference throughout the pages of one site. There is also a 'mirror' fee for a site that's pretty much greatly reproducing still another single site. What I am discussing here is the re-print of pages of content independently, as opposed to in a mass, on multiple sites.

Another clarification: 'fee' is a loaded concept in SEO. 'Penalty' ensures that search engines may punish a website for violations of the engine's conditions of service. The abuse often means making it more unlikely that the site will appear in search results. Abuse also can suggest elimination from the search engine's index of web pages (' de-indexing' or 'delisting ').

How have I increased the 'repeat material penalty' myth?

* PageRank. Plenty of high-PageRank websites reprint content and offer content for reprint. The most obvious case could be the news wires such as Reuters (PR 8) and the Associated Press (PR 9) that reprint to internet sites such as http://www.nytimes.com (PR 1-0).

* The growth of material publishing web sites. Clicking url possibly provides warnings you can tell your co-worker. Nowadays there are countless internet sites specialized in re-print content as it is just a inexpensive, easy magnet for web traffic, specially search engine traffic.

* Experience. I have seen important se traffic both from distributing content to be re-printed and from reprinting content on the website.

How I Doubled Search Engine Traffic with Reprint Information

When I first began distributing content for my major site, I was stunned by the highly targeted traffic I got from visitors simply clicking the link at the end of the article. Research motor traffic also gradually increased equally from the links and from having material on the website.

But I was a lot more stunned with the search engine traffic I got when I began getting reprint articles on the website in September. I'd written a significant number of reprint articles for clients and gathered a few webmaster 'fans' who looked out for my articles to reprint them. I desired to make it easier for them to find all the publishing articles I'd written.

I did not want to draw too much focus on these posts, which had nothing regarding the main issue of the site, content. And so I hidden the articles in one portion of your website.

The articles got a surprising number of search-engine traffic. The traffic was overwhelmingly from Google, and for long multiple-word research strings that just were in the article word for word.

Why was I astonished with the search engine traffic?

1. The articles had therefore little link popularity. The link reputation to the articles came largely from just one link to the 'reprint content' page from the homepage, which linked to group pages, which linked to the articles themselves–three clicks from the homepage. The sitemap was massive, above 10-0 links, therefore its PageRank contribution was small. My pastor discovered IAMSport by searching the Internet. Since these articles were on the site this type of small amount of time I highly question they got any links from other websites.

2. The articles had therefore much opposition. These articles have been re-printed far more commonly than the average reprint report, that is happy if it makes it in to a few devoted reprint web sites. Within my company I'd done all the research of reprinting my customers' articles for them. In reality, I ensure at-least 10-0 reprints o-n Google-indexed web-pages either for every article or band of articles. So that is up to 100 web pages, sometimes more, that were competing with my web site to surface in search engine results for the search string. Learn further on this related article - Click here: google penguin penalty.

Why Do Re-print Articles Get Search Motor Traffic?

You'd think Google would only pick one web-page with the content as the authoritative edition and send all the traffic to it.

But that's perhaps not how Google works. Each of the se's take a look at facets beyond just the content on the web site. They look at links. Google, at least, claims to look at 10-0 aspects full. Many of these must relate solely to this content on the page, although not all of them.

The complete experience has given me great insight in-to what factors Google uses as well as what we'd look at the page itself, and the relative significance of each.

* Web-page titles (the one in the html subject label) are really impor-tant as tie-breakers between two otherwise equally matched pages. Many reprinters waste the html title, utilising the report title because the web site title. Set yourself apart by making unique five-to-ten-word web site titles that include goal key words.

* Content tweaks. You can even add the article with an original, keyword-laden editor's note, and end the article off with some keyword-laced comments.

* Intra-site link popularity and anchor text (that's, for links to the content page from other web pages on the website) are also important. If you can not link to the page from the homepage, keep it as near the homepage as possible and filter out extraneous links (try putting all your site procedures about the same page).

Re-print articles, such as the search engine traffic they provide, cost nothing. Do not look a gift horse in the mouth. Forget the 'duplicate content penalty.' Be in o-n content reprints and discuss the search engine prosperity..